1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central.

Charlotte J. Haug, M http://www.sildenafilcitrate.net/what-is-kamagra .D., Ph.D.1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central, an open-access publisher owned by Springer, retracted 43 content articles for the same reason. How is it possible to fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal plants, had set up a simple process. He gave journals tips for peer reviewers for his manuscripts, offering them with e-mail and titles addresses. But these addresses were ones he created, therefore the requests to review went to him or his colleagues directly. The fallout from Moon’s confession: 28 content in various journals published by Informa were retracted, and one editor resigned. An editor at one of the journals released by Sage Publications became suspicious, sparking a comprehensive and lengthy investigation, in July 2014 which resulted in the retraction of 60 articles.

Patients with a platelet count of less than 50,000 per cubic millimeter received a platelet transfusion prior to the process, according to local guidelines. Sufferers with a platelet count between 50,000 and 80,000 per cubic millimeter received a platelet transfusion at the discretion of the investigator or physician performing the task and were treated relating to local suggestions. Assessments had been performed on days 7, 14, 21, and 30 of follow-up. The scholarly study was concluded following the assessment on day 30 of follow-up. An independent data and safety monitoring committee was established to review safety data through the scholarly study.